Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

On iterated revision in the AGM framework

Abstract : While AGM belief revision identifies belief states with sets of formulas, proposals for iterated revision are usually based on more complex belief states. In this paper we investigate within the AGM framework several postulates embodying some aspects of iterated revision. Our main results are negative: when added to the AGM postulates, our postulates force revision to be maxichoice (whenever the new piece of information is inconsistent with the current beliefs the resulting belief set is maximal). We also compare our results to revision operators with memory and we investigate some postulates proposed in this framework.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-univ-artois.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03300685
Contributor : Fabien Delorme <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, September 1, 2021 - 1:59:08 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, September 9, 2021 - 3:10:00 PM

File

Ecsqaru03Rev.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Andreas Herzig, Sébastien Konieczny, Laurent Perrussel. On iterated revision in the AGM framework. 7th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2003), 2003, Aalborg, Denmark. pp.477-488, ⟨10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_39⟩. ⟨hal-03300685⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

22

Files downloads

46